The numbers — velodrome-tested, not marketed
14 W
Median swing from two frame bottles into the cockpit: stop paying 6 W, start collecting 8 W.
8 W
Median for the double-bottle BTA versus no bottles, top bottle forward. Best measured 14 W; 7.3 W with it further back.
6 angles
Angle-matched spacers from 0° to 30°, so both bottles sit level whatever your extensions do.
Two bottles, and nobody asks where they go
A full-distance bike leg needs more fluid than one bottle carries, so the second goes on the down tube. Two 750 ml frame bottles cost an average of 7 W at 45 km/h in our own velodrome testing. Move both into the cockpit and the same test returns a median of 8 W.
It’s not the bottle. It’s the gap it fills.
01 — The dead air
A pocket of separated, stalling air sits between your forearms and your chest. Aerodynamically, that pocket is expensive.
02 — Filling the gap
A bottle placed there fills it, so air is guided round your body instead of separating — and you can drink without leaving aero.
03 — Carrying the second bottle up front
The redesigned V2 top section keeps both bottles in the cockpit, so you get race-day volume without putting back the drag you just removed. A median of 8 W with the top bottle forward, 7.3 W with it further back.
The data
The whole test, not the flattering slice. 35 athletes, four bottle setups, one velodrome, measured at race speed.
- 35 athletes, Ballerup Super Arena velodrome, Copenhagen.
- Test speeds 35–50 km/h, reported at 45 km/h.
- Baseline CdA 0.165–0.237.
- Medians: −6 W, 4.5 W, 8.0 W and 7.3 W, in the order shown.
- Two frame bottles: average 7 W, median 6 W, worst measured 12 W.
- Best measured Aero BTA result 14 W. Not all riders tested every setup.
- Bars are group averages; whiskers the spread. Results vary with rider.
Built to sit exactly where the gap is
01 — Redesigned top section
The top bottle sits forward between the arms for maximum aero, or further back towards the chest. One bottle or two on the same mount.
02 — Modular spacer system
Six spacer angles from 0° to 30° keep both bottles horizontal at any extension angle.
03 — Three width fits
Medium 52–148 mm, Wide 148–198 mm, Extra Wide above 198 mm. No filing parts down to fit.
04 — Works with your hydration system
Clamps to standard pad bridges, matte black, and compatible with the XLAB Torpedo. Your existing armcups do the clamping.
Take two measurements before you order
Your extension angle and your armpad bridge width. Get both right and the bottles sit horizontal and centred.
Match your spacer to your extension angle
Match the spacer to the upward tilt of the whole assembly — mounting bracket and extensions together, not just the extension. Extensions level (0°) → the 0° spacer; tilted 20° → the 20° spacer; 30° → the 30° spacer.
Not sure? Rest your phone’s level app flat on your extensions to read the angle.
Measure your armpad bridge width
Bolt centre to bolt centre, straight across: Medium 52–148 mm, Wide 148–198 mm, Extra Wide 198–238 mm.
How it mounts
Sandwiched under your armcups, which clamp it in place. No extra brackets, and no swapping your pads.
Plate width chart
| Fit | Bolt-to-bolt pad-bridge width |
|---|---|
| Medium | 52–148 mm |
| Wide | 148–198 mm |
| Extra Wide | 198–238 mm |
What’s in the box
One mounting plate, one angled spacer, one top piece and all bolts. Cages and bottles separate; XLAB Torpedo compatible.
Tools and install
Standard allen keys, a few minutes. Choose your plate width and spacer angle above before ordering.
This started as a bottle stuffed down a race suit
Discovered by accident, raced at the highest level, then banned. This is the legal successor.
Founder Kristoffer Visti raced the Danish Nationals with a bottle down the front of his suit, and found the gain by accident.
Magnus Ditlev used the same technique at the Ironman World Championship in Kona.
World Triathlon and Ironman banned it — for safety and uniformity, not aerodynamics.
Same principle, properly mounted. V2 goes further: both race bottles in the cockpit, none on the frame.
Built for long-course riders who don’t want a frame bottle
This is for you if
- One bottle isn’t enough, and you don’t want the second on the down tube.
- A TT or triathlon bike with a tri-bar cockpit and pad bridge.
- You want to fine-tune fore-aft bottle position, not accept one fixed spot.
- You run an XLAB Torpedo or similar and want it to fit.
This isn’t for you if
- A road bike with no clip-ons and no pad bridge.
- You only ever run one bottle up front — that’s the Aero BTA system.
- Rear hydration and storage — that’s the Aero BTS PRO.
- You don’t care about angle-matching.
Pad bridge, two bottles, and you care about the number? Built for that.
Fit and installation, answered
The top bottle sits forward between the arms or further back towards the chest, and the mount takes one or two bottles. Our 35-athlete test measured both: 8 W median versus no bottles with it forward, 7.3 W further back, against 4.5 W for a single bottle. Choose the Aero BTA system if you only ever run one.
Three plate widths: Medium 52–148 mm, Wide 148–198 mm, Extra Wide above 198 mm. Measure bolt-to-bolt across your pad bridge — the chart is in the setup guide above.
Yes. Bottle cages and bottles are purchased separately.
Yes. One or two bottles on the same mount, so you can add the second for long course without changing hardware.
That’s what the spacers are for — 0° to 30° in six steps, matched to your whole extension assembly.
One mounting plate, one angled spacer, one top piece and all bolts. Cages and bottles are purchased separately.
No. Standard allen keys, a few minutes. The plate goes under your existing pads.
Our own velodrome testing at Ballerup Super Arena, Copenhagen: 35 athletes, 35–50 km/h, reported at 45 km/h versus riding with no bottles. Median 8 W with the top bottle forward, 7.3 W further back; best 14 W. Two frame bottles cost a median of 6 W.
30-day satisfaction guarantee on unused units in original condition and packaging. Confirm your pad-bridge width and extension angle first.
All aero figures from AeroGain in-house velodrome testing at Ballerup Super Arena, Copenhagen: 35 athletes, test speeds 35–50 km/h, baseline CdA 0.165–0.237, reported as power saved at 45 km/h versus riding with no bottles at all. The double-bottle BTA median is 8 W with the top bottle forward between the arms and 7.3 W with it further back; best measured 14 W. Two 750 ml frame bottles cost an average of 7 W, a median of 6 W, worst measured 12 W — so switching is worth a median of 14 W, an average of 15 W, and 26 W in the best measured case. A single bottle between the arms returns a median of 4.5 W. Not all riders tested every setup. Individual results vary with rider position, bottle size and yaw. Test conditions available on request.
Velodrome-tested in Denmark
Both bottles in the cockpit. None on the frame.
Median 8 W versus riding with no bottles, 14 W at best — and a median 14 W swing off two frame bottles. One or two bottles, six spacer angles, three plate widths, XLAB Torpedo compatible.
Made and tested in Denmark · Express FedEx · 30-day satisfaction guarantee